Unity and Educational Outcomes

April 30, 2025

What is public education and how we should pay for it are questions every resident should be asking themselves. The debate on education funding rages on, fueled by the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s ruling that the Governor’s ‘veto’, which created additional funding of $325 per student annually through property taxes or state aid until the year 2425, is lawful.

Yet support for public education in its current form is far from solid.   A recent study shows that 68% of likely Wisconsin voters support school choice programs.   It is a mathematical certainty that two systems will cost more to maintain than one.  

It is far past time that instead of just talking about dollars, a conversation is had about the erosion of support of public education. 

There is no polling to back up my next thoughts to my knowledge but roll with me here. If a poll asked if taxpayer dollars should pay for mathematics education for all students, my guess is that the answer would be a high percentage of people would say, “yes.”   That would be because there is not a lot of interpretation about numerical calculations.   Similarly, one would suspect a high approval to fund reading and writing, but we do have some evidence about a philosophical teaching approach which transitioned education away from phonetics, resulting in lower test scores. How about the subject of history?  It is much more subject to ideology. The same goes for science.   What about sex education?  The further we go down the rabbit hole, the more subjective the answer of whether it is a class for everyone, or just for ‘some’ while the rest of the students are forced to consume it.   

Thus is our dilemma.  This is perhaps most recently demonstrated by the School District of Beloit’s recent Board of Education meeting.   Rather than a hard look at real education priorities in the face of another failed referendum, this recent meeting turned into more than an hour of subjective philosophical discussion regarding which flags should be flown at district buildings.

I’m not here to make a case for people on either side of this issue.   However, whenever one upholds one group within a whole student community and wishes to demonstrate their need for prominence, there will always be those who feel shut out and object to such practices.

In Beloit, the argument was made that the situation could be ended by simply allowing only the U.S. and State flags to be flown.   In this writer’s opinion, that’s the education system we need.   One that is broad, and less subjective.  One that says we are all American and all Wisconsinites.   Beyond that, the public must ask themselves if it is necessary to fly flags of any other sort.   What does it accomplish in the baseline mission of providing children with an education to succeed and prosper?   The same questions can be asked of DEI policy, gender studies and a myriad of subjective and opinion-based discussions that have filtered their way into classrooms.   Is the mission of education – to teach a myriad of opinions, or is it to present a factual curriculum that leaves religion, politics, gender identity and other such discussions between family members?

One thing is certain, if a majority of voters believed the system was truly serving the needs of their children and families, they would offer the needed financial support.

The question we need to ask ourselves is what we are truly unified in seeing in our public education system and what is causing the divisions that are setting districts back. 

To learn more and to sign-up for e-updates, go to RockCountyFirst.com/subscribe, and visit our Facebook page at FB.com/rockcountyfirst.

Also, please visit our RCF Youth Development page to learn more about how RCF is encouraging students and assisting schools in Rock County in educating youth on the importance of civic engagement and community service, locally.

Other Articles From Our Blog

The County Wants More, Now What?

The County Wants More, Now What?

Welcome to tax time. It’s that time of year when we take the money we’ve earned, and hand it over to people who haven’t earned it, but want to spend it. Let me be clear. I have respect for elected officials who use the tax dollars their entity receives, responsibly. We need roads, bridges, fire and police services, water services and all those needs vital to quality of life. That will cost money and I’m happy to pay my fair share as I’m sure most of you are.
Year End Reflection

Year End Reflection

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. The holiday season is busy for all of us, and it is one of the best seasons to see Liberty in action and used in ways that uplift us all. The choices we make as to where we will do our holiday shopping, which charities we will contribute dollars to and what we do with our time seem to all center on the idea that Christmas is for everyone. We reach out to those in need and those who are downtrodden. We want to provide a lift to those with low spirits. We want God to “bless us, everyone.” The coming New Year has many of us thinking of changes we can make in our lives to make things better. Maybe we look to eating better, getting healthier, helping more charities, mentoring children or any number of other choices. It underscores the goodness in the souls of most of us. I’ve never heard anyone make a resolution to gain weight or to get in more arguments with their neighbor. We seem to feel a keener definition on what a society should look like.
If All Else Fails, Raise Debt!

If All Else Fails, Raise Debt!

Let me explain this as simply as I can. See if you can follow this tiny government example. Your government receives $1000 in taxes each year and has $1000 in expenses. Taxes are predictable and stable. Then, your governing board decides that an item is needed that is outside the budget. Rules prevent them from raising taxes. They could “tighten their belt” and find areas to cut to accommodate the new expense. But instead, they decide it would be easier to borrow $100 for 10 years at a 5% interest rate. Even at simple interest rates, this means that the cost of the money borrowed is $5.00 that first year. The government must increase their expenses by $5.00 that year to cover the interest. With principal repayment, the government has now created a deficit of $15. They can either hope the rules allow them to raise taxes to balance the budget, or they may have to borrow again to cover the difference. This example can be expanded by moving the decimal point. A $10,000,000 budget and $1,000,000 in borrowing in the same example brings a burden of $150,000 per year.